Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Cell & Bioscience

Fig. 3

From: Dysregulated ac4C modification of mRNA in a mouse model of early-stage Alzheimer’s disease

Fig. 3

Transcriptomic profiling of hippocampal mRNA in 3-month-old WT and 5×FAD mice shows that the expression profiles mainly overlap with only minimal differences. A RNA-sequencing was performed on three independent samples from each group. A total of 16,123 mRNAs (raw count > 1) were detected in at least two WT samples, and 16,108 mRNAs were detected in the 5×FAD group. Non-overlapping regions indicate mRNAs detected only in isolated samples. B Correlation analysis demonstrated strong intra-group and inter-group consistency, visualized through an ellipse plot where Spearman’s correlation coefficients are shown in black. Flatter ellipses indicate stronger correlations. C Based on the PCA of the top 50% most variable mRNAs, normalized by Transcripts Per Million (TPM), there was no clear separation between the WT (blue dots) and 5×FAD (red dots) samples along PC1, suggesting overlapping transcriptomic profiles between the two groups. D A Venn diagram illustrating the overlap of mRNAs detected in both WT and 5×FAD mice, revealing 16,108 shared mRNAs, with 15 unique to WT. E Scatter plot comparing average TPM values for mRNAs between WT (x-axis) and 5×FAD (y-axis) groups, showing high overall correlation (R = 0.9942), indicating largely conserved expression levels. F Volcano plot of mRNA expression differences, indicating that 16,433 mRNAs showed no significant change. G Pie chart depicting the percentage of differentially expressed mRNAs versus non-significant mRNAs in 5×FAD compared to WT, from a total of 16,510 mRNAs. H Sector graph showing the number of differentially expressed mRNAs versus non-significant mRNAs related to upregulated and downregulated proteins. Only 3 up-regulated and 6 down-regulated proteins corresponded to differentially expressed mRNAs. I Venn diagram illustrating the intersection of differentially expressed mRNAs between this study and an AD-model online database, revealing 66 overlapping mRNAs. J Scatter plot of the 66 overlapping differentially expressed mRNAs between this study (x-axis) and the AD-model online database (y-axis), showing a high correlation in fold change (R = 0.9126)

Back to article page